The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data
The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data
Blog Article
I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was developing more force and was slower compared to previous stuff. I do not recall if I even tried out regular h4831 or not; I am imagining not.
I've used H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There are not many cartridges that I utilize it for as I look normally to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can not say that it won't perform. It is just that some other powders work superior for any specified cartridge. For example, during the 280, H4831 gave me excellent velocity and really good teams with Nosler 140 AB. Having said that, RL19 was marginally far better in precision, although the velocity was just about equivalent.
What is the primary difference? Compression. With no Intense/hefty compression linked to the very long grain 7828, the stress curve was altered along with the load fell apart.
That means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, find a starting off load when only one is shown for a selected cartridge.
Thornton, CO Source of H4831SC is beginning to dwindle down much too so get what you need for your new load I'd counsel. Can be all of absolutely nothing whenever they restock everything shortly but All those powders are owning transport regulation concerns.
Liberalism; The unachievable nevertheless recognized notion that it is completely feasible to select up a turd from the cleanse conclude.
I am utilizing it having a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did perfectly but I used to be somewhat concerned about temp stability. I think I'm at seventy two grains and have all over 2850ish fps
If you have some heavier .224" bullets, you may perhaps discover a load that actually works OK Together with the 4831. The bullets I attempted that were in excess of 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which had the normal 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the most important bullet that would h4831 vs h4831sc stabilize, nonetheless it did that wonderfully. It's a humorous-on the lookout bullet using a rounded nose profile, but it surely shoots great and kills properly. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down right away with rib-cage hits.
I've identified the exact reverse being accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly precise powder in my three hundred Earn Mag.
Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain measurement, hence, the designation SC or brief Lower. The shorter, additional compact kernels enable the powder to move through h4831sc the powder actions far more efficiently, assisting to reduce the regular chopping of granules.
Kansas Metropolis, MO I would seize whatsoever is obtainable at this time. I’ve made use of both equally even though h4831sc load data with my go to load and didn’t see nearly anything diverse overall performance intelligent.
It is probably that no even further dialogue is necessary, wherein circumstance we recommend beginning a fresh thread. If even so you are feeling your reaction is needed it is possible to even now do this.
rayporter mentioned: i in no way seen a change besides the standard is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Click to broaden...
If I have a pound or two of the powder and receive more of precisely the same, only another lot amount, I will combine all of them up making sure that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.